Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-10-13 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's 81.2 score. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite were only released 1 months apart, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is a lot heavier but incredibly thinner. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple additional features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a little bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a quite bigger display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a smaller camera sensor and a much lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 4820mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.