Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro's overall score of 90. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has Android 10. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is heavier but incredibly thinner than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and both were released only 0 months apart.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a larger aperture.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.