Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's 90.7 overall score. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is somewhat heavier but somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and both were released only 6 months apart.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing lower quality photos and videos and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to Galaxy Z Fold 2's one, both have the same 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.