Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi 6's 76.5 score. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much heavier than Xiaomi Mi 6, it's just a bit thinner and also way newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel quantity per screen inch. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 34 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has higher video frame rates and a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi 6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi 6, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.