Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-03-06 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.10 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue and Purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 9's score of 83.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is newer and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9's, but it is also noticeably heavier. Xiaomi Mi 9 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater count of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 36 percent more battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9 captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.