Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's 81.4 general score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is extremely heavier than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, it's a bit thinner and newer.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller screen and a much lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller camera sensor shooting lower quality photographs and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.