Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, having a 94.6 score against 82.2. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and notably thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's, but it's a lot heavier.
Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display and a way worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.