Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Max, getting a global score of 94.6 against 77.5. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is newer and a little thinner, but a lot heavier than Xiaomi Mi Max. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a larger display, a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a little bit better pixels quantity per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a worse video quality and a lot less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Max has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 4850mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.