Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, getting a score of 94.6 against 77.5. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a a lot newer and a little thinner phone than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, but it is also way heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a larger display, a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a just a bit better amount of pixels in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same resolution camera and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations, a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos and higher video frame rate.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi Max 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.