Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-10-10 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 614.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, with a 94.6 score against 81.2. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but way heavier than the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2. Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a screen that's just as good as the screen in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 have similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have exactly the same internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a 12 mega pixels camera in the back, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a much bigger sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture and higher video frame rate. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has a 32 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.