Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, having a 94.6 score against 83.8. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, it's thinner and also extremely newer. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a display that's very similar to Galaxy Z Fold 2's display, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much smaller display and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, they have the same internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has faster video frame rate and a much larger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.