Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, getting a global score of 94.6 against 83.8. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, although it is heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a lot lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Galaxy Z Fold 2's one, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a really longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 41 percent more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a worse video quality and a less mega pixels back facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.