Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, having a 94.6 score against 89. Both phones we are comparing include the same Android 11 operating system, so both should give the same OS features. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and heavier than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, it's body is still somewhat thinner.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a screen that's just as good as Galaxy Z Fold 2's screen, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photographs or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot better video quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features a battery duration that is very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy Z Fold 2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.