Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-09-18 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, with a 94.6 score against 76. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a notably newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, although it's a lot heavier. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution and a really larger display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 6 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a worse video definition and a back facing camera with lot less MP, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi Note 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.