Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, getting a global score of 94.6 against 87.9. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is way heavier but extremely thinner. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little greater display density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, it also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher video definition and a back-facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.