Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F3, having a 94.6 score against 87.3. These phones use the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should count with identical operating system features. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is thinner but extremely heavier than Xiaomi Poco F3, and they were only released with a couple of months difference.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco F3 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 both feature quite similar processing units, and although the Xiaomi Poco F3 has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Poco F3 captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 4520mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.