Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-05-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G's 80.8 general score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is much thinner but extremely heavier. Both devices in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 have quite similar displays, because although the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has a little smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G also counts with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G features a little better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.