Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco X2's overall score of 79.3. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Poco X2 were released with only a few months difference, Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is incredibly thinner but heavier than Xiaomi Poco X2. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user the same operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xiaomi Poco X2 feature incredibly similar batteries duration. Xiaomi Poco X2 has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a lot better 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.