Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC were released only 0 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is extremely thinner but much heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10, providing you a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.