Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's 83.4 score. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is heavier but noticeably thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and both were released with only 6 months difference.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and Galaxy Z Fold 2 count with extremely similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures and lower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a much more MP back camera.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.