Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-03-23 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Laser Black, Laser Blue and POCO Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 696 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, having a overall score of 94.6 against 76.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and notably heavier than the Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, it's construction is still thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much faster processor than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, because although it has a much less megapixels camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.