Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 global score. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, providing a couple nice extra features and increased performance. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is heavier but incredibly thinner than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and both of them were released only 4 months apart.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a quite worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera sensor providing a lower image quality and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 33 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.