Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, with a 94.6 score against 78.3. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is thinner but extremely heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and both of them were only released 7 months apart. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a back camera with lot less MP, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.