Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-05-26 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, having a 94.6 score against 79.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G were only released 8 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is heavier but noticeably thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 feature very similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.