Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 general score. These phones include the same Android 11 operating system. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S were released only a few months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is extremely heavier but also thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a brighter display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a back-facing camera with much less MP resolution, they both have a same size aperture. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.