Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, with a 94.6 score against 77.1. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos, a much higher resolution camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.