Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, having a 94.6 score against 83.1. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2710 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a much bigger sensor, a back camera with a way better 200 MP resolution and a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.