Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, having a 94.6 score against 77.2. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it is also noticeably heavier. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a 12 MP back camera, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.