Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, having a global score of 94.6 against 80.3. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is newer and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's, but it is a lot heavier. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a screen that is just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a much lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a camera with a much better resolution and better video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.