Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's overall score of 83. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10, offering a lot of extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is incredibly heavier but much thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T have incredibly similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a lot lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a greater storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a lot better resolution back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.