Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than ZTE Axon 20, getting a 94.6 score against 77.8. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the ZTE Axon 20 were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is much heavier but thinner than the ZTE Axon 20. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10, providing the user a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The ZTE Axon 20 shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera and a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way bigger memory for applications and games than ZTE Axon 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit longer battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as ZTE Axon 20. If you want to save some money, you can buy the ZTE Axon 20, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.