Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 3's score of 90.6. Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is older and thicker than Galaxy Z Fold 3, it's body is still lighter. IPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11 operating system.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a little better processing power than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a lot larger aperture for better captures in low light environments. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much greater memory for apps and games than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit longer battery life than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.