Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, getting a 93.3 score against 90.6. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro design is noticeably lighter but thicker than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and both were only released 1 months apart. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 works with Android 11 operating system.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a more powerful processor than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 13 Pro features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little worse 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much better battery lifetime than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3095mAh.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the iPhone 13 Pro also has a much larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.