Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 9.x |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is slightly better than Apple iPhone 6s's global score of 83. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and thinner device than the Apple iPhone 6s, although it is also way heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11 operating system, and Apple iPhone 6s works with iOS 9.x operating system.
The iPhone 6s features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has a really smaller screen, a much lower 1334 x 750 resolution and a just a little lower screen density. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a superior storage for apps and games than iPhone 6s, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Apple iPhone 6s has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and also slower, it also counts with an additional GPU and a 64 bits processor. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a superior battery lifetime than iPhone 6s, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 6s shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3. Both have a F2.2 diafragm aperture and a 12 mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.