Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 9.x |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is a bit better than the Apple iPhone 6s Plus's score of 84.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is notably newer and thinner than Apple iPhone 6s Plus's, although it is way heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 works with Android 11 operating system, while Apple iPhone 6s Plus comes with iOS 9.x operating system.
Apple iPhone 6s Plus features just a bit better performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 6 less and slower processing cores, it also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit. IPhone 6s Plus counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a superior storage to install applications and games than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way better battery life than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 4400mAh battery size. IPhone 6s Plus counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3. They have a F2.2 aperture and a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.