Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Apple iPhone 7, getting a 90.6 score against 81.6. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is much newer and somewhat thinner than Apple iPhone 7's, although it's notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better processor than Apple iPhone 7, because it has more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The iPhone 7 has a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has a lot worse 750 x 1334 resolution, a lot smaller screen and a just a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the screen. The iPhone 7 has as much memory for apps and games as the Galaxy Z Fold 3 one, both have equal 256 GB internal memory.
IPhone 7 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 12 megapixels resolution, the iPhone 7 also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone 7, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.