Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Apple iPhone XR, having a 90.6 score against 82. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is way newer and way thinner than Apple iPhone XR's, but it's also a lot heavier. Apple iPhone XR features a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792, a little bit smaller screen and a little lower screen density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone XR features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 lesser and slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone XR takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a camera with a 12 MP resolution, the Apple iPhone XR also has a larger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.