Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-05-25 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), getting a global score of 90.6 against 77.8. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is incredibly newer and notably thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019). Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot more MP back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.