Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is much better than Google Pixel's 80.2 score. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way heavier than the Google Pixel, it's noticeably thinner and also newer. The Google Pixel counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM memory. The Google Pixel counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with more MP and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 59 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.