Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Google Pixel 3, having a score of 90.6 against 80. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is newer and thinner, but much heavier than the Google Pixel 3. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller screen and a way worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light photography and a back-facing camera with more megapixels. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.