Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with a 90.6 score against 80.7. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much heavier than Google Pixel 3 XL, it's somewhat thinner and incredibly newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. Google Pixel 3 XL shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back-facing camera with more megapixels and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.