Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Google Pixel 4, getting a 90.6 score against 81.9. Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way heavier than the Google Pixel 4, it's thinner and newer. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller screen and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better pixel count in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. Google Pixel 4 has a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way larger aperture and a back camera with more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.