Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 372 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the HTC One M9, having a overall score of 90.6 against 77.7. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing lots of additional features. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot heavier than HTC One M9, it's noticeably thinner and extremely newer.
The HTC One M9 features a better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The HTC One M9 has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 9 GB lesser RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processor and an additional graphics co-processor. HTC One M9 shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 55% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.