Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 372 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than HTC U Ultra, having a 90.6 score against 77. Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner device than the HTC U Ultra, but it's also way heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a better pixel density. The HTC U Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 megapixels, the HTC U Ultra also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
HTC U Ultra features more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.