Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 372 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the HTC U11, having a overall score of 90.6 against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is extremely newer and thinner than HTC U11's, although it's noticeably heavier. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little bit better performance than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
HTC U11 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 1440 x 2560px resolution, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen. The HTC U11 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the HTC U11 also has a much bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.