Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Titanium and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the LG K61, with a 90.6 score against 77.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the older 11 version while LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is newer and incredibly thinner than LG K61's, although it is also much heavier.
LG K61 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little smaller display and a much lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch in the display. The LG K61 has much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little faster CPU than LG K61, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little better battery life than LG K61, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity. The LG K61 captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.