Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is better than LG V10's general score of 78.6. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1, providing you lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is much newer and way thinner than the LG V10's, but it is incredibly heavier.
The LG V10 features a better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display. LG V10 has a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a better performing processing unit than LG V10, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM. The LG V10 shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back-facing camera with way more MP and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 47 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.