Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 3's global score of 90.6. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but LG Wing has 10 version while Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11 version. LG Wing's body is a little lighter than the Galaxy Z Fold 3, but it's incredibly thicker and was released about 10 months before.
LG Wing counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than LG Wing, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
The LG Wing counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Wing also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Wing has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger camera aperture and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit longer battery life than LG Wing, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.