Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, having a general score of 90.6 against 87.1. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Motorola Edge 20 Lite were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is a lot heavier but notably thinner.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better processing power than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a screen that is just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a quite smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations and a way more megapixels back-facing camera. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a little bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.