Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Moto G Power (2021), having a general score of 90.6 against 76.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Moto G Power (2021) were released only a couple of months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is way heavier but also incredibly thinner than the Moto G Power (2021).
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit faster processor than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much better display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a lot better resolution of 1768 x 2208px, a better pixels amount in each inch in the display and a bigger screen.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G Power (2021) shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot larger diafragm aperture and a lot better 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Moto G Power (2021) counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.